Heutagogy, Emergent, Ambient (2)
This is the second of three posts looking at developing the heutagogic qualities of the Open Context Model of Learning (OCM) into the Emergent Learning Model and from that examining the possibilities of building an Ambient Learning City in Manchester (with MOSI-ALONG). The OCM is an attempt to re-conceptualise learning post web 2.0, with a concern to rethink roles and responsibilities for learning as suggested by the LGC Manifesto. An earlier blog post, the first of a sequence of three of which this is number two, used the concept of the PAH Continuum to look at how teachers might develop a craft of teaching that would enable and support the self-organisation of learners. Sugata Mitra, who works on similar ideas, is now talking about Self-Organised Learning Environments (SOLE). However what we are discussing here is perhaps the conceptual follow on, what I call an Emergent Learning Model (ELM), for reasons that I hope will become clear.
Emergent Learning Model
The ELM is an attempt to take forward the Open Context Model of Learning, which essentially are fresh ideas about how to re-conceptualise the processes of learning by taking account of the affordances of web 2.0 technologies. The Open Context Model of Learning is a way of thinking about the relationships of learning such that a (teacher) develops both a subject understanding as well as an ability in the (learner) to take forward their learning in that subject. That is often taken to mean through classroom interactions, but it doesn’t have to mean only that, it could start with learner interactions; conversations, interests and collaboration.
ELM was also stimulated by an attempt to address the requirement of the EU’s i2015 for countries to integrate informal, non-formal and formal learning, an extension of the Bologna Process of educational ‘harmonisation’. However I have tried to do this NOT by subsuming all modes of learning under rules set by a University, as i2015 might imply, BUT by re-thinking what we mean by each of these modes of learning; informal, non-formal and formal. What I hoped to do below with the ELM is to show how all learning can be complementary and, given that everyone wants to learn, how we can design learner-responsive resources, institutions and networks.
It is from this latter point, which is reflected in Sugata Mitra’s work, recently described by his article in the Guardian on 10 year-olds teaching themselves O-levels, that the description Emergent Learning Model comes from. This model could have been called an Organic Model (after Ken Robinson’s discussion in The Element about the nature of creative learning) or a Discovery Model of Learning (after the affordances of Google’s tools for learning) but both Mitra’s description of his work as being about emergent behaviour, and Steven Johnson’s description of innovation coming from emergent behaviour evolving out of new ‘open platforms’, encourage me to think that what is being modelled here is the emergent behaviour of learning in any context. Perhaps because it is self-organising and uses resources as needed in the learning process, not to reflect the structure in which they are provided.
As a method of engaging with these ideas you might prefer to look at the ELM itself first (presented as a table on Slideshare) and then pose me, or yourself some questions as to how it might work in practice; or what it’s flaws might be; comments gratefully received and answered. For the rest of this post I will elaborate on the three part structure of ELM and what this re-conceptualisation of learning as a system then allows us to do with learning and educational systems design.
Rethinking Informal, non-formal and Formal Learning
Firstly I will examine how we might most usefully think about learning, by trying to tease out how we might best describe its informal, non-formal and formal characteristics.
Informal Learning
Informal Learning has often been seen as learning we do in our free time outside of institutions. What we choose to learn informally usually comes from our own interests. Historically this has often been located in libraries, sometimes described as ‘street-corner Universities’ because of the ready availability of reference books for fact-checking, of text-books, for subject-based understanding, of non-fiction books, for a broader understanding of the world, and of novels, for descriptions of the lives of others. But it has also been seen as a key part of community or adult learning, that is as long as managerial targets related to formal assessment processes aren’t added to that learning process.
For the purposes of Emergent Learning Model I want to focus more on the aspect of the interests of individuals and also to foreground the social process of learning. I think Mitra’s work is so successful with learners because he cleverly foregrounds the social process of learning by using access to learning resources as a framing device (resources are how we scaffold learners as I put it in the ELM table). He designs the pre-condition for social processes to emerge, which is the essence of informal learning. It has been said that you cant design for informal learning, but I think we actually do that much of the time, as the social processes of informal learning are in many ways the pre-condition for formal learning outcomes to emerge. So for the Emergent Learning Model I will define informal learning as;
Informal Learning is the social processes that support self-organised learning in any context
Non-formal learning;
When I was working on the Metadata for Community Content project, partly looking at how we might create ‘digital divide’ (or socially inclusive) content for informal, or ‘community’ e-learning, we concluded that we were working on a project concerning non-formal learning, which we defined as ‘structured learning opportunities without formal learning outcomes’. Arguably this was because we were working in the context of what became named as Adult & Community Learning (ACL), and we were concerned to identify learning content that would better engage disaffected learners. Based on an adaptive model of resource creation we termed the informal model of e-learning, which was a dynamic co-creation model of learning, we identified a process of resource creation that responded to learners interests whilst removing the institutional power relationships of educators from the learning process.
We developed a learning model in which content creation toolkits would be the primary tool needed by teachers, and which the website aclearn.net was originally predicated upon, and such learning content, supported by a range of resources such as people, was capable of brokering learning processes. Consequently I have come to see the structuring of learning opportunities through resources, something I don’t think OERs do, as the key process in non-formal learning. (The co-creation dimension of this suggests that learner-generated content can have as much value as educator-generated content, for certain aspects of learning – as suggested by the concept of obuchenie)
Non-formal learning is structured learning resources without formal learning outcomes.
Formal Learning
For me Formal Learning means education as a system, rather than learning as a process, whether it be academic or vocational, which is about the institutionalisation of processes surrounding learning. This may be a process that prepares people for University, those secular storehouses of knowledge;
- Primary school prepares us to be learners as defined by formal education,
- Secondary school assesses if we have become good enough learners to become students,
- University is where fully accredited learning finally takes place.
People who ‘fail’ this academic sifting process are offered vocational education so they can acquire a socially useful set of skills,
People who also ‘fail’ vocationally are expected to be sufficiently ‘literate’ to converse with the system that failed them.
People who succeed in this process obtain various forms of accreditation and qualifications that prove they have ‘learnt.’ In many cases enough learning goes on for this system to be able to replicate itself successfully, even adapting to new social norms that are laid on top of it (academies, free schools, etc). The most significant part of institutionalised formal education system are the institutions themselves. What formal learning, or education, has really become specialised in is maintaining itself as a set of institutions and buildings. But this is done to enable them to offer accredited qualifications to students and this is the essence of formal learning, rather than their buildings and location.
Formal learning is the process of administering and quality assuring the accreditation of learning and the qualifications
Emergent Learning Model
So what ELM aims to do is to replace the notion of learning as being a process of accreditation, that occurs within an institutionally constrained and hierarchical system, with a series of processes that better matches how people actually learn, following interests, collaborating and finding resources. It is far less about serving the needs of academia and more about meeting the needs and interests of human beings because we can actually Trust Us.
ELM also tries to take account of, and respond to, much of the new thinking about learning and much else, done by many in the last twenty years; emergent properties, network effects, systems design, etc., in response to the permanent beta which is everyday life, what happens whilst you are making plans as John Lennon put it. Which is not to deny that the requirements of studying different subjects vary and that people have different capabilities, which present a range of issues that need to be addressed within an education system. Nor that a Ph.D isn’t much harder than a GCSE (although at the time I found A-levels the hardest level of education, Masters degrees are a whole lot easier when you rise to that stage), or that devising modes of assessment and accreditation that reflect the quality of learning undertaken isn’t tricky and requires experience, sense and tact. But we have learnt a lot about the practical concerns of recognising learning and we are smart enough to reflect on what we have learnt, and even perhaps devise new systems of learning; which is what I am, like many others, trying to do here.
So the underpinning idea of the Emergent Learning Model is that we should start with the social processes of everyday life, and design a system that enables learning to naturally emerge, rather than respond to the hierarchical status-frenzy of large academic organizations. We should value the professionalism of the teacher and the desire of the learner, and create resources that enable those interests to merge. Because people should be the resource with which we scaffold institutions;
Reading the Emergent Learning Model table;
The table is designed as a heuristic, an aide memoire, to capture as much of learning and education within a single table in order to facilitate reflection and discussion on how we might design, support and implement models of learning rather than simply reproducing the traditional structures of institutionalised education; which do have good qualities for administering paper-based record-keeping systems.
a) education; is a process organized by institutions who offer qualifications based on set texts to be used by learning groups in classes to meet accreditation criteria. Teachers provide resources and broker these educational processes.
b) learning; is a process of problem-solving carried out by people individually or collaboratively by finding resources and discussing the emerging issues with trusted intermediaries.
An underpinning value of each is the contrasting views of the learner, in an education system the processes are designed with the belief that learners don’t want to learn and need extrinsic motivations; the currently popular social capital model of education embodied in the Browne Report and education fees and graduate tax models is based on an extrinsic model. A learning system is designed around the belief that learners are interested in their learning and only need intrinsic motivations. Extrinsic motivations may be needed to create engagment in learning that isn’t interesting which trusted intermediaries are capable of addressing.
Summary;
So the ELM can be described as;
People + Resources = Learning
But asks the question do we present this institutionally or adaptively. New approaches to learning like SOLE, new theories such as the Open Context Model of Learning (and many others such as Connectionism, Netagogy, mobigogy, etc.) show that we can foreground learning rather than the institution and design FOR emergence.
The table is designed to show that Education and Learning overlap at all points, but a difference in emphasis, values and design can enable learning to drive institutional behaviours rather than institutional priorities to constrain what can be recognized as learning.
A simple reference model;
Another way of looking at this using books as a reference could be that;
Smart Mobs + Everything is Miscellaneous means Here Comes Everybody
We can design learning systems that are inclusive, high-value and also enable everyone to reach their potential. New tools and approaches are emerging that challenge us to do that; this is my take on how to address that challenge.
[…] how to design ambient learning environments using the Emergent Learning Model. Slides for this session are from the Ambient Learning City talk March […]
[…] Ambient Learning City concept is based on three key concepts from the Emergent Learning Model; People, Resources, Institutions. In MOSI-ALONG we are looking at people to some extent but […]
[…] Emergent Learning Model « The Heutagogic Archives This is the second of a series of posts by Fred Garnett. The first appeared in Nov 2010 and I tagged it then as relevant to content and design of EDU8111. This post extends those ideas and is equally relevant to the course and to some other work we are commencing in mlearning. (tags: ee4l mLearning usqict) […]
[…] En el marco de las mesas de Educación de nuestra Fundación, el Dr. Sugata Mitra hizo una exposición sobre sus investigaciones y el método de enseñanza ELSE (Emergent Learning System of Education). […]
Hi, Stewart Hase here. Love the post. I’m interested in your faith in formal education. Fred Emery once quipped that, Education pokes your eyes out. University teaches you braille and postgraduate education is speed reading in braille.
I have no faith in formal education, my take on academics is that they are A-level students in steroids, that is they have been through a pre-determined arc of success and think the world works like that. I think that learning takes place in what we usually call informal learning, and that people who fail in the education system are failed by the education system. However, to paraphrase John Seeley Brown, formal education is ‘where the money is’ although it isn’t where the learning is. In the UK every educational and learning initiative is battered down by the question of how do you assess what has been learnt with the ring-holders of the current system claiming. The point of the PAH Continuum is to reconstruct the learning process so it becomes about learner learning to learn, rather than memorise. The point of the emergent learning model is to render unto learning that which is learning and unto education that which is education, before the formalists seize all the money again and embed them is self-fulfilling educational policies and targets.
Incidentally I’m from the post-Fred Emery generation who arent scared of the education system but I’ve actually heard Kevin Carey speed reading in braille and he is awesome 🙂
[…] 1. WikiQuals is based on the Emergent Learning Model. This posits a 3-stage process of ‘learning’ built around the emergent and social properties of groups. In this model the social-process of learning is built around a self-organised group that collaboratively identifies its learning needs and then both discovers and creates the resources it needs to meet their self-identified learning needs. We have identified a group willing to do this for the academic year 2011/12 and this blog will outline the issues we will be addressing in making this work. More detailed information on the Emergent Learning Model is available in the outline table on slideshare and also in the blog post on Emergent Learning. […]
Hi Fred,
Typing this again. Hopefully, I will remember what I said in the previous comment which is now lost.
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to connect with you this morning and discuss the Emergent Learning Framework. It is a shame that we couldn’t have you with us today but we hope to see you in person in the near future.
We (#coresep11 of the Postgraduate Certiciate in Academic Practice @pgcap) have read with interest about this model and would like to take this opportunity to ask our first question, which comes from Fiona:
How can the Emergent Learning Framework be used in practice? Could you please share your ideas on this when we connect to start the conversation. We are really looking forward to our conversation with you. Speak very soon ;o)
#coresep11 @pgcap’
How do we make the Emergent Learning Model work in practice?
Interview with me on how I developed the technique of ‘brokering learning’
http://alchemi.co.uk/archives/ele/fred_garnett_on.html
Video from purposedPSI at Sheffield Hallam University discussing working with Star Award Winning Teachers 2006
From 6’30” in 8’40”
Slides for this talk (seen in video) PurposedPSI;
This also discusses the Craft of Teaching
How do we do this in HE,?
See Tomas Cochrane’s work using the PAH Continuum to design tech use on the BA in Product Design in Unitec NZ;
http://prezi.com/kr94rajmvk9u/mlearning/
& Original Paper
Click to access ALTJ.pdf
Also see Mosi-Along
& WikiQuals
http://wikiquals.wordpress.com/
This is based on the Learner-generated Contexts Research Group paper an Open Context Model of Learning which is about “Finding A Coincidence of Motivations leading to Agile Configurations”
LGC were a team who built a social network for learning (a Facebook for Learning) for the government in 2002, but had it rejected.
More ideas in Redesigning Learning Contexts (Rose Luckin)
Hi Fred,
Thank you for sharing these useful resources with us. They will be very valuable and aid our understanding of this model and learning and teaching more generally.
After re-reading your post, I noticed now more, that relationships seem to be at the heart in this model. Would it be possible to explain why you feel the social element is important for (more) learning? Do we talk about learning as an open and transparent partnership that empowers the teacher and the learner at the same time and creates shared ownership and opportunities for connected thinking, action and learning?
Thank you
Chrissi from the @pgcap
A very pertinent second question on learning relationships. Will answer this after we have discussed the initial points of What is ELM? And how does this apply to HE?
Do you acknowledge that the three types of learing that you identify informal or formal need to go on at the same time in order for his model to work in this University setting do you have any evidence??
Evidence?
ELM given as a paper at CELDA 2009
See Mike Wesch on Digital Ethnography
See Thomas Cochrane on Intentional CPD
Mike Wesch; YouTube Channel Digital Ethnography;
http://www.youtube.com/mwesch/
A Vision of Students Today;
http://www.youtube.com/mwesch/#p/u/11/dGCJ46vyR9o
Machine is Us/ing Us;
http://www.youtube.com/mwesch/#p/u/14/6gmP4nk0EOE
[…] organic ways, I would say, and are resistant to anything that is too prescriptive. I have found the Emergent Learning Framework by Fred Garnett useful and enlightening in this aspect and it does raise the question of the purpose of education, […]
[…] have managed to do so far (Ramsden, Learning to Teach, 2003; Fred Garnett, The Heutagogic Archives https://heutagogicarchive.wordpress.com/2011/04/11/emergent-learning-model/; Jan D.Vermunt, The Power Of Teaching-Learning Environments to Influence Student Learning) is that […]
[…] WikiQuals model is based on the Emergent Learning Model, which aims to design learning systems based on how people learn rather than where they are housed. […]
[…] main reason for developing WikiQuals, which grows out of the “formal” part of the Emergent Learning Model, derives from previous experiences I’ve had of discussing alternative modes of learning […]
[…] Emergent Learning Model; We also found that once our thinking about learning embraces a post-curriculum model and engages […]
[…] background-position: 50% 0px; background-color:#222222; background-repeat : no-repeat; } heutagogicarchive.wordpress.com – Today, 5:37 […]
[…] https://heutagogicarchive.wordpress.com/2011/04/11/emergent-learning-model/ […]
[…] on heutagogicarchive.wordpress.com Valora esto: Me gusta:Me gustaSé el primero en decir que te gusta esta post. […]
thanks Juan, me gusta así
[…] which are based on new 21st Century pedagogies; such as the Open Context Model of Learning or the Emergent Learning Model c) Design learning experiences that offer complexity, authenticity and engagement; what the Digital […]
[…] will be there, also doing a presentation about his WikiQuals Project. Fred has also developed an Emergent Learning Model so it will be interesting to finally meet him and swop […]
Great to hear you will be there Jenny 🙂 Look forward to meeting up, talking and allowing new ideas to emerge!
[…] Development Frameworks; Transforming not e-enabling; We worked together on a project to develop an E-Maturity Framework for Further Education (EMFFE) with 15 colleges, representing the full range of approaches in UK FE, and some advisors like Bob Harrison and Kevin Donovan. The key outcome of this work for our thinking was that in transforming institutions you cannot use existing management benchmarks, a key indicator in evaluating FE College performance, you need something different. We came to call this a “development framework” which can be used to get insights on how transformation might work. The EMFFE was a development framework. We then used this thinking first in the PAH Continuum and then in the Emergent Model of Learning. […]
[…] on developing post Web 2.0 models of learning, such as the Open Context Model of Learning and the Emergent Learning Model. This resulted in trying to develop learning environments “beyond the classroom” […]
[…] https://heutagogicarchive.wordpress.com/2011/04/11/emergent-learning-model/ […]
[…] https://heutagogicarchive.wordpress.com/2011/04/11/emergent-learning-model/ […]
[…] finally – We developed the Emergent Learning Model as a design tool to help create new modes of education and we have used it on Ambient Learning City […]