Feeds:
Posts
Comments

My friend Jack eats Heutagogy

Sheep and Schopenhauer

Know no future, fear no past” so singing Jack Hues solves Schopenhauer’s Conundrum; for sheep. Being creative entails addressing the dialogical problems the future sets for us when “history will teach us nothing”. Meanwhile education is a system of bullying and grooming that farcically forces us to look ONLY at the past whilst the unrevealed future always arrives in a multiplicity of ever baffling ways. We’ve trained and instructed ourselves as a species not to be context-responsive; curiously so because that was how evolution shaped us. Yet making music can force us to address our multitudes afresh as it’s about developing our interactive capabilities viscerally. We sing the body collective.

Failed Musicians: Twenty years ago I chaired my first research seminar on informal e-learning at the RSA in London. In my opening remarks I casually mentioned that the best people in (digital research ) were all failed musicians; the next four speakers all revealed that they had started as musicians. I had even moved down here to London to become a musician. Circumstances lead me to becoming an editor, an activist and a self-determined learner instead. The long and winding path of curiosity. My favourite drummers didn’t have such luxury of choice so they became self-directed musicians, especially in the Analogue Revolution of the Sixties. What we putative musicians had learnt was play, listening, failure, resilience and how to continually reframe our thinking as necessary.

This is your brain on music: as we’ve decided socially, since the Enlightenment, to value “Culture” hierarchically, we’ve also placed musicians and their formalised modes of expression at the top of (our) classically historic value-tree. However Daniel Levitin reveals that, neurologically, we learnt to sing together first, as our original means of sharing (conscious) communications and everyday language, and the grammars that subsequently emerged. Singing was the original way in which we shaped our collective futures. Playground hopping and skipping, and their attendant rhyming and singing, are ways children emerge into listening and conversing socially; jumping not so much. As Mark Nagel similarly points out in Wired for Culture we humans have evolved a culture for transmitting what we’ve learnt together about ourselves and our overlapping environments. Culture exists first of all to help us become aware of, and know ourselves as points on a wavy curve.

Singing ourselves into being; whilst the research neuroscientist Levitin pragmatically demonstrates our evolutionary social history of communicating he also has a radically different speculative vision of how that emerged socially. He believes all societies sang themselves into being with Six Songs; friendship, joy, comfort, religion, knowledge, and love. We collaborated culturally to allow the social lineaments by which we might live to emerge. Without these songs we can’t build society anew. What Levitin suggests is that we musically shape our founding myths and their attendant futures. Currently however we are plagued by Flags and national anthems designed to reinforce the origin stories of our, globalised, nation-states. Despite Thomas Dolby’s “Windpower” we’ve haven’t yet sung into being the necessary origin myths of an original ecological society.

Who were you meant to be?

The Liberal Art of Music: in my long search for useful models with which we might replace our cruel and bloody usual education systems (and now death by OFSTED) I’ve delighted in the Liberal Arts curriculum of the Medieval University. A learning process whereby they place development of the practical skills of arts and crafts ahead of the taxonomy of subject “mastery” held back to post-graduate study; hence Masters degrees. Delightfully music was then seen as a fundamental skill with which to become an educated person. Developing a range of skills for communicating and collaborating with our peers was, back then, at the heart of organised education.

Public Skills not Private Skills; the three liberal language arts of grammar, rhetoric, and dialectic, and the four number arts of music, arithmetic, geometry, and astronomy. were put in place to develop someone who could contribute publicly. The original Academy of Plato was a place of public discourse amongst a community of scholars who, collaboratively made sense of the ideas of wise men.

Music at the core of 7 Liberal Arts

And then Charles II chartered science into existence replacing discursive natural philosophy with the deceitful hierarchical certainties of taxonomy (1660) of the Royal Society. The ‘scientific method’ has allowed untrammelled egos to rule our mental domains ever since, arguing that all you need is knowledge until Nobel Prize winners blew away our abilities to think for ourselves. Ever after we sidelined and denigrated friendship, joy and comfort. Original thought requires a multiplicity of metaphors to draw upon to stimulate our creativity and the advent of science and the scientific method has created the current monoculture of thoughtlessness that renders us stupefied in the face of existential threats. Great men no longer have the answer(s)…

Who’s in charge of knowledge?

Creating Creativity Culturally: since we’ve learnt to decry culture as our social way of being, lionising instead Culture as a hierarchical system of economic rewards, especially if you “own” with its attendant curation of value, we’re left with the farce. The chant of the ever-circling skeletal art-form. Whereas as a species we are naturally creative when our culture is based on the play of mutuality. And creativity is sourced through the open play of ourselves with each other. As kids of my generation used to say “let’s go out and play” in our co-created gardens of playful delights where we create fresh metaphors meaningful just to us.

All You Need is Heutagogy: having co-created an academic model of how we might learn (the open context model of learning) based on rethinking how we might teach, I then decided to create a description which could be understood by almost everyone. After creating a novelisation of the theory (63/68 A Visceral History) a fellow researcher at Oxford University (Russell Francis) challenged me to do this with The Beatles. Amazingly my PAH formulation helped reveal patterns in the Beatles development as recording artists. Pedagogy the period when, as recording artists producer George Martin showed them how to turn their Merseybeat songs into Hit records. Andragogy when their new-found recording confidence enabled them to listen to and discuss with fellow musicians. Heutagogy when their recording Mastery enabled them to treat the recording studio itself as a musical instrument reframing how everyone thought about popular music.

Remake/Remodel: the single best book on the Heutagogy of Music, and much else besides, is Michael Bracewell’s book on Roxy Music originally called Remake/Remodel; Roxy don’t even make an appearance until 200 pages in. These initial pages however discuss ART School education from 1945 to 1970, when Roxy Music got it together. Notably the concept of a Foundation Year when all putative artists try out a range of crafts beyond that skill that had earned them a place at college. So creating a wider set of frames for their art. The music group Pulp’s most famous song Common People was written by Jarvis Cocker after he took such an optional class in sculpture at St Martins College of Arts (where the Sex Pistols played their first gig) and met “she came from Greece”

She had a thirst for knowledge

10,000 hours on the Violin; in The Craftsman Richard Sennett puts forward the idea that a craft understanding of a tool, in his case playing the violin, takes 10,000 hours. After which, he argues, you can switch from going deep to going wide. With which you might be able to move from knowledge to wisdom, as we sometimes see, and hear, in great art. As an Emeritus Professor Sennett is also, as I describe it, a “failed musician” who has written, with depth and insight, into what he learnt whilst playing music. My interpretation of that it is the practical play that our curious relationship to art affords us that enables us to develop an enduring creativity. The wellspring from which we can reframe how we might live. And I agree with Levitin that music, singing together, is where we might start…

Everything is a Song; as Jack sings his resonant metaphor “know no future, fear no past” he prompts us in three dimensions of time to ruminate slowly and thoughtfully; remember the past, engage with the present, create the future. If you personally wish to affect the future then you need a wide-ranging knowledge of the past filtered by contemporary concerns. We don’t face a planetary existential crisis currently, we face an epistemological crisis. Unwisely we have locked up access to useful knowledge in ivory towers and now asks scientists to joylessly explain us to ourselves! We need to sing into being new, transformative, metaphors if we wish to sing into being the society that pleases us most…

Why the Heutagogy of Music? Because if we allow music back into schools then the creativity of engaging in the arts will help transform how we engage with everything beyond the deadly hallows of our exam-based education systems, which merely train us to be dissatisfied warriors of extraction rather than satisfied collaborators of many and mutual distinctions…

PAH; If, as I suggest, education requires subject-based teaching (Pedagogy), discussions and conversations about what we’ve just heard or are interested in (Andragogy), as well as the creative stimulation of solving problems (Heutagogy) then these varying cognitions need various modes of stimulation. Teaching can stimulate our cognition, conversation can stimulate our meta-cognition but our epistemic cognition needs more. To reframe our thinking we need to be able draw upon a wide range of metaphors so we may move criteria across contexts as Giles Lane describes how we might think afresh.

As Jude Rogers put it; I learned that music can be a starting point on a much broader cultural adventure, taking in the interests, heritage and history of people.

When I first heard The Beatles (other musical excitements, of your choice, are available) I was excited, thrilled by the sound I heard and responded viscerally to what my ears revealed to me. As I followed their Songlines through my time in secondary school (Ballad of John & Yoko was toppermost of the poppermost when I sat my last exam) they revealed the many lines of desire by which I might live my adult life. When I needed comfort they brought me joy. When I needed knowledge they brought me love. When we seemed at war they counted me in and gave me the religion of music… I am he as you are me as we are altogether

Nothing you can sing that can’t be sung

Notes (WIP) 1) Academics steal the ground on which we think 2) We’ve become a self-stupefying species 3) Creativity is fragmentation (fragmentation is creativity) 4) as the Stones said; why don’t we sing together (see what happens)

26th September 2023

Ten Years of World Heutagogy Day

26th September 2013 Stewart Hase and Chris Kenyon published Self-Determined Learning on Bloomsbury books. This was a decade after their seminal paper From Andragogy to Heutagogy.

10 years of identifying new Heutagogy practices

The Learner-Generated Contexts Research Group had published the Open Context Model of Learning in 2007 built around the PAH Continuum and Thom Cochrane had applied the PAH Continuum to the use of social media on a University degree in Auckland; A Framework for Designing Transformative Social Media.

Lisa-Marie Blashke presented her seminal review of Heutagogy and Lifelong Learning and added in the concept of double-loop learning. Heutagogy as a valid educational practice was ready to challenge the Academy. Even if Ivory Towers are too high from the ground to hear the swelling sounds whispering change…

Following these educational innovations, and others, Stewart and Chris gathered together this developing theory and practice to publish Self-Determined Learning, summarised in What is Heutagogy?

What is Heutagogy 2013 overview

2014 World Heutagogy Day on Curating Informal Learning was a live session held at the London Knowledge Lab with Stewart Hase and Chris Kenyon heutagogy 101

2015 World Heutagogy Day on Heutagogical Practices as developed and defined by Bernard in Uganda

2016 World Heutagogy Day on Creativity in Learning (practical workshop resource)

2017 World Heutagogy Day on Healthcare and Meaning Making

2018 World Heutagogy Day on Learner-Centred Learning

2019 World Heutagogy Day on How Do We Green Our Learning?

2019 Teachers Guide on Greening the Curriculum…

How can teachers “Green The Curriculum”?

2021 World Heutagogy Day on Learners Agency celebrating the free online Book on edtechbooks which can be read here Unleashing the Power of Learning Agency (edited by Stewart Hase & Lisa Marie Blaschke)

2020 World Heutagogy for Teachers day defined by Vijaya Khanu Bote’s Heutagogy for Primary Schools, which details the practices she put into place in the world’s first Heutagogy Brainery in Andhara Pradesh India – free PDF download

2020 World Heutagogy Crew and our submission to UNESCO; Is Heutagogy the Future of Education?

2022 World Heutagogy Day celebrated the opening of the world’s first Heutagogy school the Heutagogy Brainery by the world leading Vijaya Khanu Bote to develop her Heutagogs

63/68 not forgetting the Worlds first Heutagogs The Beatles and All You Need is Heutagogy…

2023 World Heutagogy Day on Home Learning as we develop it this month, more here….

Fred Garnett 26th September 2023 #wHday23

Tuesday 26th September 2023

This is a quick blog post to initiate this years World Heutagogy Day about Home Learning, inspired by Marlena Wolford and her son Oscar (and their friends) who wish to set up a home learning programme so that they children do not have to go to secondary school in South East London, where we all live.

As is customary we will be asking up to 20 interested parties to describe, in just 50 words, how they would make home learning work for children of secondary school age

Some more information about World Heutagogy Day which this blog has been supporting and the ideas that we we have been sharing and collating since 26th September 2013, can be found in this summary set of slides below. As you can see from the picture World Heutagogy Day celebrates annually the publication of the Bloomsbury book Self-Determined Learning edited by Stewart Hase and Chris Kenyon.

We welcome contributions from everyone; What do you think we need to do to make home learning work? (please post as a comment, in 50 words please, below) ALSO If you have experience, comments, thoughts or useful links, please add them in the comments section. We will pull all contributions together for World Heutagogy Day and, hopefully, use them.

Fred Garnett’s 50 words;

Home-learning needs to be learner-centred, enabling personal curiosity to lead our learning.

My librarian Mum helped me discover long-form reading, my father guided me through complex mathematics giving me a craft of learning

We need to build out from individual learner interests to identify various learning opportunities in multiple contexts.”

Fred Garnett 6th September 2023

Questioning Accreditation

There’s no such thing as cheating just bad educational design. And our current 20th century education systems, outdated, outmoded and not fit for context, are hopelessly inept at being context responsive, let alone identifying the learning needs and interests of individual learners. The current inevitable moral panic about ChatGPT encouraging cheating (it’s a content delivery tool) could only happen in a system that is so unaware of its lineaments that it still thinks that the 11th century platitude that content is king still applies. As we continue to say here context is queen…

Ironically education, the system, which repeatedly tell us it knows best, arrogantly assumes that learning what each individual uniquely takes away is what happens as a matter of course to anyone within an education institution. In this perspective learning ONLY exists within education. Consequently education needs to both demonstrate the benefits of formal education and denigrate the values of every other mode. Loading up on qualifications, rolling the numbers and insisting their is no alternative has become the educational modus operandi.

When Margaret Thatcher decided in 1986 to overhaul the education system to make sure that the creative sixties “never happens again” she created a modern, universal dotheboys punitive system that ineffably drove the learning out of education. As an Oxbridge chemist herself, specialising in adulterating wholesome products in pursuit of excess profits, she had no qualms in refining education into our current system of bullying and grooming that rewards unquestioning drones and ignores with extreme prejudice the rest of us. If you fail educationally it is your fault!

This formal compulsory education has perverted society, all of us, into believing that only formally “qualified” people have anything useful to contribute. (It’s still more of the fast and stupid decontextualisation we suffer from) In an era of declining employment opportunities which believes in the managerialism of keyboard jockeys managing zero-hours unskilled worker drones then a race to the top of the narrow hierarchy of success by arrogant and privileged Oxbridge graduates concerned only with perpetuating elitism ignorance and taxonomy looks like a purposeful education. Those that succeed think it is and want everyone else to believe exactly like them.

I’ve written elsewhere about how I developed my own personal craft of learning, becoming a self-directed learner as Stewart Hase would call it, or a Heutagog, as Vijaya would call me, by time I was 10. Schools did not represent continuity to me but rather very noisy interruptions of my own fascinating (to me) and ever developing interests. I’ve even written a novel 63/68 A Visceral History about my time in 3 Secondary schools which focusses on my informal learning which was driven by my obsession with music, pop, rock and psychedelia

Baby You can Drive My Learning; prompted by a digital learning doctoral researcher at Oxford University, Russell Francis, I tried to analyse how the Beatles learnt to become such original, and unique creative musicians using my PAH continuum frame. Whilst I believed that Heutagogy was about enabling creativity it was enlightening to see how the Beatles, as recording artists, became self-determined learners with a myriad of insights for 21st century learners. No wonder the Conservative Party wants to restrict poorer people to a couple of token places at Oxbridge when All You Need is Heutagogy

Beatles as 21st century learners

How do we accredit self-managed learning is a very old question! But newly asked of me by a home-educator who doesn’t want the learners in her charge to lose out in our blinkered education institutions. I’ve addressed this in multiple ways previously, most notably in WikiQuals and Ambient Learning City (in both Manchester & Timisoara).

In both cases I used the Emergent Learning Model as a design tool which Nigel Ecclesfield and I created as our contribution to the EU Bologna Process concerning how to integrate formal, non-formal and informal learning. It includes our insightful mapping of education to learning where we argue that education starts with formal institutional outputs whereas learning starts with informal practices by people (eg The Beatles). The nux of differentiation occurs in the use of resources.Education says use this text book (and nothing else) and be prepared to regurgitate it precisely like a speaking click. Learning says find your own resources, understand them as you wish & explain their usefulness.

Design your own education system

By demonstrable equivalence I mean offering a way of evaluating any alternative mode of learning, especially self-directed learning by motivated learners (or anyone as everyone wants to learn). Frankly this is really easy. I’ve been doing this since I started teaching my own classes in the USA in 1980. I purposefully designed IN alternative assessment options of demonstrable equivalence because I detested the American university end of term exams as a way of assessing learning. Instead of railing pointlessly against something I had no experience of I thought of a solution offering multiple navigation paths (6) from multiple-choice answers to design your own exam. However our educators choose to ignore these simple alternatives because they themselves were raised in our dire educational monoculture and can’t see the forest for the papers.

We need “the optimism of the learners not the pessimism of the educators”

What I argue for in the PAH Continuum is the co-creation of learning between subject specialist teachers (pedagogy) and learners who have nothing to lose but their curiosity. Teachers are vested in their subject knowledge but only paid for repetition, and punished for deviation or hesitation. As in 1984 OFSTED are watching them critically. However it is possible, as I discovered in the USA, to use subject expertise as a starting point for providing learners with their own paths through any subject, unit, course or programme of (learning) within an educational institution.

PAH continuum Pegagogy Andragogy Heutagogy

In the beginning was the word “mine”

As I was saying to the students at London Metropolitan University when talking about “Northern Poly is Occupied”

Back in the 80s & 90s we talked about developing an Information Appliance in the future. “Information” sits within the interesting pattern of Data Information Knowledge Wisdom. What you have in your hands is not a “smart” phone but an Information Appliance. It merely takes data and processes it into information; that’s it…
When we were occupying Northern Poly we were interacting with the world on our own terms, from which we were gaining knowledge of how the world works. Probably not gaining wisdom from what we were experiencing, but that became a possibility once we “lost”. We had to work out why a “just” cause (fighting institutional racism) “lost” in a what we thought was a “just” world…

And, After Talking At Nigel’s, about Learning in the Age of Algorithms (a chapter in our book Digital Learning) I think I can add about AI that
a) proprietary digital tools position you to receive data that has been curated into “information” by (now) unreliable corporate entities. That’s why Google as much as Apple (as much as xMOOCs invented by Harvard to dominate the global education market) gives you search returns that they determine “you” want” in order to intensify your identity as a mere consumer.
b) If we accept being positioned as consumers of data, curated by others into saleable commodities (in other words the taxonomy of “experts”) then we are also ready to accept our inability to gain knowledge and wisdom. Which also readies us to accept that we need a “higher intelligence” (even in a nominally post-IQ world) than we think we are capable of acquiring, in order to explain worldly complexities to us. And to think for us; at a price…

When something like “so-called AI” drops Into this unreflective DI vacuum (that the bullying education system has groomed and corralled us into accepting) it appears to be “a thing” because we’ve given up trying to move beyond uncontested information into the dangerous world of contested knowledge. A world which now in 2023 seems to be the epicentre of rage between groups which live by their very specific, but differing tenets, rigidly nailed down by the specific limits of the “fast information” to which they subscribe to and believe in; passionately. As we each buy into our unique 23NY identity we are outraged by everyone else’s. Once upon a time civilisation meant we used to fight over territorial boundaries, now we fight over our unbounded identities and its discontents (which is all that financialised consumerism leaves us with).

So Smart Phones are training us to accept a particular pattern of data & information, determined in Silicon Valley, and which is structured around consumption patterns and behaviors (the now global post-Thanksgiving Black Friday). This is reminding us at speed that we humans are too thoughtless to gain Knowledge and then perhaps to achieve wisdom for ourselves. In the land of data and information everything else is otherworldly…

I noticed this beginning to happen in the mid-nineties; namely that as the “computerization” of information systems” moved out of businesses into society, starting with banks, we “citizens” were being identified by our customer records which defined us, and so positioned us socially, very narrowly. Consequently I wrote a Greenwich University unit called “Information Systems in Society” to examine what “Social Information Systems” might look like in the 21st century instead of Business Information Systems having unrestricted social provenance. Having worked on the first EU XTML project GALA (Global Access to Local Applications – resulting in an early version of the interactive screen interface with which our smartphones are now faced) I presented a summative paper to the Digital Cities conference (1999) entitled “Building Citizen-centric systems in the Knowledge Economy”. When I presented a more technical version of that paper “An Information Architecture for Civil Society” to PWC outlining the “social” ambitions of our (“Facebook”) social network I remember the sheer panic in their eyes because these management consultants only know how to turn everything into a business proposition (and bill expensively to prove they know what they are doing, just like lawyers in a John Grisham novel). We even set up a digital policy group *lastfridaymob* to outline what a future digitised society might look like (a creative, interactive, participatory democracy).

When I was Head of Community Programmes at Becta working on building digital “learning centres” and online learning platforms (CGfLs – Community Grids for Learning) the wonderful thing was that these futures (our present) were unwritten and still wide open.

As well as delivering government policy programmes (£250m CALL) I had to develop both my own and my 11-person team’s understanding of this emerging “open” digital world. One thing I did was to organise a monthly “policy lunch” with an invited speaker discussing some cutting edge digital thingy, including the “Semantic Web” in around 2003. Web 2.0 had just then arrived, as he explained, and the Semantic Web would develop as Web 3.0, based on machines talking to each other (to save humans time). Semantic Web workers, co-ordinated by W3C (https://www.w3.org/standards/semanticweb/ ) were trying to create the machine language to enable the automation of web-based interactions (dynamic interactions rather than periodic ones).

Web1.0 was the flat web; a document is here, you can read it and/or download it – the read-only web

Web2.0 was not an upgrade or a new release it was qualitatively different as it was the “participatory web” or the Read/Write Web. “Wikis” and Wikipedia were the examplars of this as anyone could edit a web2.0 page. However the “participatory web” also involves a qualitative shift in user responsibilities. To avoid the utter chaos caused by everybody editing everything all the time, then either we all have to do this responsibly or some maintenance workers have to track whenever people change online content; e.g. is this a hack or a valid edit? That’s how Wikipedia works through the voluntarism of editors (failed doctoral librarians with grudges in my experience) the open standards setting W3C and some academic research. The participatory web needs a governing council for any hub, application or platform. However what has happened in our now entirely financialised public sphere is that the participatory web is not managed by the “cognitive surplus” (Clay Shirkey) of enlightened individuals collaboratively sharing the responsibility of maintenance (a la Ayn Rand’s “heroic engineers”). Platforms are now owned by billionaires monetising the shit out of social interactions because “there’s no such thing as society” And every disruptor wants to be a unicorn…

Web3.0 is, arguably, the AI web. In that the premise is that it is a seamless (non-proprietary) “web of data” which every human can interrogate by using a structured query language (SQL); ie asking questions. That’s not only incredibly hard to do theoretically and technically Web 2.0 can’t even do it for text queries that we type into a search box (e.g. Google – why Google is NOT a search engine AND is the prime cause of “fake news” is whole other missive). Search Engines, like Blue Peter, operate on the principal “here’s an answer I made up (just for you) earlier”.

We’ve now all accepted that what we want from the web is “really fast answers” that are so plausible that we don’t even question how good they are. Why? Because education has trained us to believe whatever experts say (as every American movie continually reminds you).

We uncritically accept that information curated by somebody else is what an answer is. Web 2.0 is interactive but it isn’t participatory, because that’s been educated out of us by the lethal taxonomists of education; we’ve been curated into oblivion as a thinking species

Film by Mike Franks

Data is any simplified, irreducible point of reference (in quantum terms a particle)

Information is a curated collection of data where the curation isn’t contested. This is often taken as being common sense.

Knowledge represents reflections on this curated information where the frame had been subjected to critical reflection, evaluated in some way

Wisdom is hard earned experiential reflections 

Data & Information are “fast” and dialectical 

Knowledge & Wisdom are “slow” and dialogical

All cultures transmit “fast” information (in order to reproduce themselves)

All cultures need “slow” in order to evolve because we are an emergent species not a manufactured one,

Fast is always “right”

Slow is always “wrong”

Context is Queen not Content is King

OR rather

Context is dialogical, Content is dialectical…

Some (Slow) Resources

1. Northern Poly is Occupied

2. Folksonomy not Taxonomy

3. Everything is A Metaphor

4. I Am Curious #Digital

5. Creative Learning

6. Learning City 2.0

Heutagogy for Communities (Andhara Pradesh, India)

Establishing Heutagogy Brainery

Since 2020, when we highlighted Heutagogy for Teachers, the world lead on Heutagogy has come from Vijaya Bhanu Kote in AP in India. Unlike us academics and educational theorists Vijaya has built Heutagogical practices into her everyday activities at primary school. As a result she has trained other teachers in her school and then developed a Heutagogy training programme for the state of AP and talked about her wonderful work in various educational conferences, especially in Finland.

World Heutagogy Day 26th September 2022 sees her launching the first school for heutagogs (her name for her learners) entitled the Heutagogy Brainery. So, today we are celebrating that launch and also asking does it provide a model which can be adopted anywhere else around the world? Is a Brainery for heutagogs a way of “Establishing Heutagogy”?

A Teachers Log Vijaya’s practical, self-determined efforts to realise Heutagogy in her school for the benefit of her learners has long reminded me of the reflections of AS Neill, who went on to found the democratic school Summerhill, as he captured them in his 1911 book A Dominie’s Log. AS Neill patiently observed and logged how his primary school children interacted. He realised that they helped each other learn and that learning was an interactive process not a didactic one. He subsequently designed his democratic school Summerhill around this principle.

Vijaya Khanu Bote discovered ideas concerning Heutagogy first outlined by Stewart Hase in From Andragogy to Heutagogy and like any true innovator reinterpreted that work and localised it in her community. Localised with her learners, with their parents, with her colleagues, with the community; then her state Andhara Pradesh and the rest of the world. Education innovation comes from opening up from the learners not from shutting down from the institution.

Heutagogy as Ecosystem; Vijaya’s self-determined teaching process is an inclusive one based on “learning beyond the classroom” by including the parents of her learning ‘Heutagogs’ and their parents. She has transformed her didactic classroom into a learning eco-system. More than that she has also included her fellow primary teachers in the process so effectively that her state of Andhara Pradesh asked her to develop a Heutagogy for Teachers training programme.

Establishing Heutagogy; the Heutagogy Brainery launched today is the next step in taking Heutagogy from a shared learning and teaching process to becoming the institutional basis of education in which we trust the learners. It’s an experiment, but it is a bottom-up experiment based on the sound principle that learners want to learn. Modern schooling, with its didactic subject based pedagogy, is based on the false assumption that people don’t want to learn and so need strict instruction in individual subjects based on memorisation by rote.

Education is a system of building and grooming in which “schooling” young people to remember precisely what they are told, and then to repeat that when examined, has become the default model of learning. Like Vijaya and many others, from Socrates onwards, I’ve argued both that we “trust the learner” and that learning is whatever the learners walks away with. The original Academy in Athens was set in an orchard in which learners were free to discuss what they’d heard indoors.

Learning has always taken place “beyond the classroom”, as Vijaya calls it, because classrooms are ONLY concerned with “content delivery” which originated in historic ages of content scarcity.

Vijaya’s statement about the origins of the Heutagogy Brainery on LearnTeach21

Fred Garnett 26th September 2022

World Heutagogy Day 2013-2022 Overview

World Heutagogy Day was initiated nine years ago on 26th September 2013, in order to recognise and promote the publication of the book Self-Determined Learning by Stewart Hase & Chris Kenyon as a way to both celebrate Heutagogy as widely as possible, and discover and share new practices

As heutagogy is, partly, about creating something new, we also decided to develop a new form of online digital expression; the curated conversation. This would draw on a collaborative process of expression and, in line with the fresh concept of the “wisdom of crowds” provide a summative view of the themes that we would be celebrating that day. As we were going global we also invented a hashtag #wHday13

2013 #wHday13 – What is Heutagogy?

2014 #wHday14 – Curating Informal Learning

We were live blogging & flashmobbing World Heutagogy Day as #myheutagogy based at the London Knowledge Lab. Click here for the blog for the event  Chris Kenyon presented Heutagogy 101

2015 #wHday15 – Heutagogical Practices

As developed by Bernard Nkuyubatswi – Full text here

2016 #wHday16 – Creativity in Learning

2017 #wHday17 Heutagogy, well-being and meaning making

2018 #wHday18 – Learner-centred learning

2019 #wHday19 – How do We Green Our Learning? 

2020 #wHday20 – Heutagogy for Teachers (introduction)

2020 UNESCO submission on Heutagogy Futures 2050

2021 #wHday21 – Unleashing the Power of Learner Agency

2022 #wHday22 – Establishing Heutagogy in Primary School

Celebrating the Launch of the Heutagogy Brainery in Andhara Pradesh, India 26/9/22 (tomorrow)

Vijaya’s statement about the origins of the Heutagogy Brainery on LearnTeach21

Fred Garnett 25/9/22

 

 

The Heutagogy of Occupations

Northern Poly is occupied 1971

Self-determined Learning as a Community Festival followed…

A Murmuration of Occupation

Words are buckets for our emotions

The guitarist strummed…

Create spectacular situations

The President suggested…

Control the means of discussion

The caterers enabled…

Union meetings are rock concerts

The student body concurred…

Act now, reflect deeply then change

The hearth discussed…

The new polytechnics build craft learning

The vice-principal published…

The damned natives shall not pass

The abseiling Colonel ordered…

Institutions can be places for self-determined transformation

Places of collective self-government

We all learned together

Poetry is the language of revolution” Jean van den Bosch 1971

The film; trailer

https://vimeo.com/684716536
Continue Reading »

World Heutagogy Day 2021

Unleashing The Power of Learner Agency

Curated Conversation

UNESCO – REPONSE – April 2021

What is your view on the coherence of the arguments presented in the Commission’s Progress Update Document? – Q1

A. The Update Document provides a coherent analysis of many of the issues facing the planet in the period between now and 2050 along with a view on the tasks of education as an entity in this period, but we feel that there is insufficient attention to the nature of educational systems as systems and what how those systems are governed by the politics and ethos of those interests that are active in fraying both democracy and civil/public life (p5).

We are particularly interested in learner agency and would endorse the following “The inter‐generational conversation that is education” (p 6), but would wish to see an acknowledgement and acceptance of the co-creation of learning and knowledge through, what we describe as “architectures of participation” as moving beyond conversation to engagement and action. Our exploration of those issues raised in the Update Document concurs with the idea of “the publicness of education” p6 and the need to implement and explore the following “A world where education is a common good is a place where bottom‐up, local initiatives blossom and self‐organized governance can also succeed on a large scale. When framed in this manner, educational projects and institutions need to be governed collectively in a public manner ………” (p6)

In the definition of “commoning”, it occurs to us that there are examples of such approaches already adopted that could be noted and illustrated in the final report to bring the following alive. “The action of “commoning” refers to building together—the acts of negotiation, communication, mutual support, and cooperation that further common interests and common projects. In education, commoning can be thought of in terms of the co‐construction of knowledge and pedagogical modes that foreground the relational and collective aspects of teaching and learning. What is achieved through commoning is provisional, fragile and contains disagreement and difference. But we achieve more together than we can apart.” (p7)

We are concerned to see phrases such as “a quality education for all” (p7) appearing in the text, as the word “quality” has been abused and debased by its use in managerialist and audit literatures and we feel it would be better to use phrases such as “meeting the needs of learners and their local contexts” and text further emphasising engagement and action in community and public settings and co-creation in learning.

References to lifelong learning (e.g. p8) are welcome, but these are not developed and there are no references to non-formal and informal learning opportunities that are going to be needed as mechanisms to expand access to learning opportunities beyond those currently offered within the vast majority of existing education systems.

The caution demonstrated in the text, in relation to “Digital, biotechnology and neuroscience developments” (p8) is a positive response to the current valorisation and/or fatalism regarding the outlook for humanity in the context of these developments. We would argue for a more strongly sceptical view to be taken about the marketing of developments in these areas and for the promotion and development of these technologies in a context governed by the active engagement of users and those affected by the use of these technologies in conceptualising future uses and their active governance of any such uses.

We are concerned that examples given of change in education foregrounds the “digitalization” of education rather than focusing on how digital technologies can be used to support, sustain and implement the active vision of education promoted and proposed in the document. How digital technologies are used by learners and practitioners for learning is a far more important topic than the use of digital technologies to control and monopolise content delivery e.g. in MOOCs and we argue against the inevitability of such developments and for more positive outlooks based on practice and engagement rather than marketing or disembodied research. A detailed discussion of “the hybrid school” p8 concept will bring out some of the issues outlined here, but current ideas of hybrid schools seem to us to be “e-enabled” rather than transformative, but a wider discussion is needed.

The use of the term “transformative disruptions” (p9) again seems to imply that the effects of technological changes are inevitable and pre-ordained by the developers of new digital technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) and to accept the “hype” surrounding these technologies and the use of the term “disruption” itself implies an acceptance of the promotion of this term, in recent years, by leading representatives of, what has been described, as “surveillance capitalism” Zuboff (2019) or Silicon Valley, as a series of corporate entities! Later in the document, reference is made to “these emergent transformations” (p 10) although we would dispute that such predicted transformations are emergent and that any response to these transformations should be held back until emergent properties can be identified

Nigel Ecclesfield

What elements need further attention, development or are missing?

Intellectual decolonization and epistemic diversity.

We are particularly pleased that you have included “Intellectual decolonization and epistemic diversity” as a key dimension of Heutagogy, as delineated in the PAH Continuum, is epistemic cognition. However we are surprised that you have made no reference to our submission on Heutagogy and have gone for the more narrow, new and untested concept of pedagogical commoning which is an intellectual aspiration with little extant practice, unlike Heutagogy. As heutagogy is about building education around “self-determined learning” it allows for intellectual decolonization whilst promoting diverse epistemic approaches to learning. We think addressing the points we have made in our submission and elaborated further here, will help developed this further. 

Since we published the PAH Continuum in the Open Context Model of Learning (2010) we have seen this work adopted in New Zealand (Thom Cochrane), Uganda (Bernard Nkuyubatswi) and India (Vijaya Bhanu Kote) through the process of “localisation” – taking the framing concepts and applying them locally by, respectively, a) developing digital practice in university learning b) providing resources for inclusive learning c) creating self-determined learners in primary school, by working with children and parents together.

The PAH Continuum is part of the Open Context Model of Learning which has been published as; Learner-Generated Contexts: A Framework to Support the Effective Use of Technology for Learning and has been cited 180 times. It is available online here;

The idea behind the “Learner-Generated Contexts” concept is that post Web 2.0 the affordances of the new digital tools now allow for learners to design the contexts in which they learn. However teachers and educational institutions have not yet developed the skill set to support this process of self-determined learning and we are trying to build such tools. The Open Context Model of Learning takes ideas made extant in UNESCO’s OER ideas, as developed and clarified in the Paris 2012 declaration, and add in the dimension of an “open pedagogy” to the idea of “open resources“.

We can see that because our submission used the heutagogic concept of a “curated conversation” that we have developed ourselves in order to be more intellectually inclusive you might have overlooked our submission in favour of traditional research papers, such as the one submitted on pedagogical commoning.

We have included here an excerpt from Hase and Blashke’s 2015 work on heutagogy as the “pedagogy of agency” designed to enable Intellectual decolonization by promoting epistemic diversity.

Continue Reading »